Model comparison
GPT-5.4 Pro vs Grok 4.7
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 46.6 on the Noometry Index. Grok 4.7 costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Grok 4.7 in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 72.0 to 41.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 30% for GPT-5.4 Pro and 17.7% for Grok 4.7.
- Grok 4.7 is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
- GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 500K.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 58.8 | 46.6 |
| Released | 2026-03-05 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 500K |
| Max output | 128K | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 42.6 (#89), Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1636 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.4% |
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1423 |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 71.0 (#10), Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 30% | 17.7% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1409 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 159.12 | — |
Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.0 (#17), Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1393 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#6), Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1413 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1396 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1406 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1391 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1389 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Grok 4.7?
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 46.6 on the Noometry Index. Grok 4.7 costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.
Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Grok 4.7 better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 42.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Grok 4.7 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.