Model comparison
GPT-5.4 Pro vs Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 48.6 on the Noometry Index. Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) costs 43× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 72.4 to 48.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath Tier 4: 58.5% for GPT-5.4 Pro and 17.1% for Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning).
- Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is cheaper at $1.25 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
- GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 58.9 | 48.6 |
| Released | 2026-03-05 | 2026-02-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 46 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 42.1 (#112)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 57.4% | 52.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1375 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1459 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,150 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 34.4 (#46)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 57.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 18% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1189 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 4,663 |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 52.3 (#32)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | 65.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | 89.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 158.93 | 151.98 |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 75% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 85.4% |
| CritPt | 30% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 63.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1451 |
| DTBench | — | 90.1% |
| LMCA | — | 38.7% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.4 |
Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 48.2 (#65)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | 44.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | 17.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 92.2% |
| ProofBench | — | 14% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1455 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 52.8 (#60)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | 89.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | 30.2% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1439 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 33.3 (#98)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1263 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 0% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1416 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 54.5 (#40)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1441 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1481 |
| LMArena French | — | 1476 |
| LMArena German | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1443 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 74.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1420 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 45.5 (#34)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 22.2% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 11.9% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1437 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 65.7 (#44)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1438 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1574 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)?
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 48.6 on the Noometry Index. Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) costs 43× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)?
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.
Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) better for coding?
GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.2 versus 42.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) has 46.