Model comparison

GPT-5.4 Pro vs GPT-6 Sol

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 49.2 on the Noometry Index. GPT-6 Sol costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 Pro OpenAI

58.8

Rank #16 Confirmed

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

49.2

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and GPT-6 Sol in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 72.0 to 35.8.
  • GPT-6 Sol is cheaper at $2 / $10 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.

Side by side

GPT-5.4 Pro and GPT-6 Sol specifications
GPT-5.4 ProGPT-6 Sol
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
Noometry Index58.849.2
Released2026-03-052026-09-22
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1.05M
Max output128K128K
Input $ / M tokens$30$2
Output $ / M tokens$180$10
Results tracked1622

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-5.4 Pro: 42.6 (#89), GPT-6 Sol: 59.6 (#11)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProGPT-6 Sol
DeepSWE—68.8%
FrontierCode—49.3%
LMArena WebDev—1692
WeirdML57.4%—
LMArena Coding—1453

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, GPT-6 Sol: 33.5 (#49)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProGPT-6 Sol
GDP.pdf—28%

Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads

GPT-5.4 Pro: 71.0 (#10), GPT-6 Sol: 49.3 (#34)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProGPT-6 Sol
ARC-AGI-283.3%—
SimpleBench74.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)—90.1%
ARC-AGI-194.5%—
CritPt30%—
Chess Puzzles58.6%—
EnigmaEval23.8%—
EBR-Bench—53.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1420
Epoch Capabilities Index159.12—

Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads

GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.0 (#17), GPT-6 Sol: 35.8 (#135)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProGPT-6 Sol
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)82.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 458.5%—
LMArena Math—1404
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)50%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)37.5%—

Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads

GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#6), GPT-6 Sol: 43.0 (#87)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProGPT-6 Sol
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.3%6.5%
GPQA Diamond94.6%—
Humanity's Last Exam44.3%—
SimpleQA Verified46.3%—
LMArena Expert—1449

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#9)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProGPT-6 Sol
Furniture Assembly—58.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, GPT-6 Sol: 51.0 (#113)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProGPT-6 Sol
LMArena Non-English—1389
LMArena Chinese—1416
LMArena Russian—1407
LMArena Spanish—1377

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, GPT-6 Sol: 74.4 (#97)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProGPT-6 Sol
LMArena Instruction Following—1406

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, GPT-6 Sol: 43.2 (#100)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProGPT-6 Sol
LMArena Longer Query—1415

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, GPT-6 Sol: 72.3 (#15)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProGPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text—1396
LMArena Creative Writing—1392
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2125
LMArena Multi-Turn—1405

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than GPT-6 Sol?

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 49.2 on the Noometry Index. GPT-6 Sol costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or GPT-6 Sol?

GPT-6 Sol is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.

Is GPT-5.4 Pro or GPT-6 Sol better for coding?

GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 42.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and GPT-6 Sol share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Sol has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper