Model comparison

GPT-5.4 nano vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 nano OpenAI

41.9

Rank #125 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #181 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 nano scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where GPT-5.4 nano leads 48.6 to 41.9.

Side by side

GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 specifications
GPT-5.4 nanoQwen2.5 Plus 1127
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.938.8
Released2026-03-17—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.20—
Output $ / M tokens$1.25—
Results tracked4014

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 43.6 (#84), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Coding14051314
SciCode46.9%—
WeirdML49.2%—
ALE-Bench1,005—

Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 23.7 (#173), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Hard Prompts13811299
ARC-AGI-25.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark39.7%—
ARC-AGI-151.5%—
CritPt9.3%—
Chess Puzzles30%—
Mystery Game Puzzles9%—
DTBench80.3%—
LMCA36.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.81—
ForecastBench57.3—

Math GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 40.9 (#88), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Math14061298
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)44.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 412.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202587.8%—
ProofBench5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)25.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)6.3%—

Knowledge GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 41.9 (#103), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Expert13961289
GPQA Diamond78.5%—
SimpleQA Verified11.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate3.1%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.4 nano: 36.7 (#78), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Vision1196—

Multilingual GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 48.6 (#140), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Non-English13591265
LMArena Chinese13921314
LMArena German13671231
LMArena Japanese13431207
LMArena Russian13631271
LMArena French1396—
LMArena Korean1320—
LMArena Spanish1371—

Instruction Following GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 71.9 (#144), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Instruction Following13621275

Long Context GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 41.6 (#137), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Longer Query13661292

Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 55.7 (#142), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Text13721299
LMArena Creative Writing13141262
LMArena Multi-Turn13821299

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.4 nano better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.4 nano or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

GPT-5.4 nano scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 nano has 40 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper