Model comparison
GPT-5.4 nano vs Grok 4.1
GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 nano scores higher in 3 categories and Grok 4.1 in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.4 nano leads 43.1 to 33.4.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 nano | Grok 4.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 40.8 |
| Released | 2026-03-17 | 2025-11-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 40 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 nano leads
GPT-5.4 nano: 43.1 (#82), Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1404 | 1445 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1214 |
| SciCode | 46.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 49.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,005 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.4 nano: —, Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 39% |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
GPT-5.4 nano: 23.8 (#159), Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1380 | 1436 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 5.7% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 39.7% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 51.5% | — |
| CritPt | 9.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 30% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 9% | — |
| DTBench | 80.3% | — |
| LMCA | 36.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.78 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.3 | — |
Math GPT-5.4 nano leads
GPT-5.4 nano: 40.7 (#76), Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1406 | 1422 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 44.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 87.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 25.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 6.3% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 nano leads
GPT-5.4 nano: 41.8 (#94), Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | 1417 |
| GPQA Diamond | 78.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 11.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.1% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.4 nano: 36.0 (#73), Grok 4.1: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1196 | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
GPT-5.4 nano: 48.8 (#136), Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1391 | 1464 |
| LMArena French | 1396 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1368 | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | 1396 |
| LMArena Korean | 1321 | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | 1363 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1368 | 1438 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 leads
GPT-5.4 nano: 72.1 (#139), Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1362 | 1400 |
Long Context Grok 4.1 leads
GPT-5.4 nano: 41.6 (#131), Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1365 | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
GPT-5.4 nano: 55.9 (#137), Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1372 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1313 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1382 | 1438 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 nano better than Grok 4.1?
GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.4 nano or Grok 4.1 better for coding?
GPT-5.4 nano scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 nano and Grok 4.1 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 nano has 40 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.