Model comparison

GPT-5.4 nano vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct

GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 nano OpenAI

41.9

Rank #125 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.8

Rank #286 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 nano scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.4 nano leads 55.7 to 29.6.
  • Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.4 nano and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct specifications
GPT-5.4 nanoGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
ProviderOpenAIIBM
Noometry Index41.930.8
Released2026-03-17—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.20—
Output $ / M tokens$1.25—
Results tracked4013

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 43.6 (#84), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Coding14051090
SciCode46.9%—
WeirdML49.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—20.5%
ALE-Bench1,005—

Reasoning GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 23.7 (#173), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13811073
ARC-AGI-25.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark39.7%—
ARC-AGI-151.5%—
CritPt9.3%—
Chess Puzzles30%—
Mystery Game Puzzles9%—
DTBench80.3%—
LMCA36.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.81—
ForecastBench57.3—

Math GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 40.9 (#88), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Math14061117
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)44.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 412.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202587.8%—
ProofBench5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)25.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)6.3%—

Knowledge GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 41.9 (#103), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Expert13961064
GPQA Diamond78.5%—
SimpleQA Verified11.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate3.1%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.4 nano: 36.7 (#78), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Vision1196—

Multilingual GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 48.6 (#140), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13591033
LMArena Chinese13921070
LMArena Russian13631045
LMArena French1396—
LMArena German1367—
LMArena Japanese1343—
LMArena Korean1320—
LMArena Spanish1371—

Instruction Following GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 71.9 (#144), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13621056

Long Context GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 41.6 (#137), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13661070

Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 nano leads

GPT-5.4 nano: 55.7 (#142), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Text13721080
LMArena Creative Writing13141046
LMArena Multi-Turn13821053

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.4 nano better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?

GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.4 nano or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?

GPT-5.4 nano scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 nano and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 nano has 40 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper