Model comparison

GPT-5.4 mini vs Qwen3-1.7B

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

45.0

Rank #76 Confirmed

Qwen3-1.7B Alibaba (Qwen)

26.6

Rank #336 Reported

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 mini scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5.4 mini leads 51.5 to 19.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 88.9% for GPT-5.4 mini and 8.1% for Qwen3-1.7B.
  • Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.4 mini and Qwen3-1.7B specifications
GPT-5.4 miniQwen3-1.7B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index45.026.6
Released2026-03-172025-04-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$4.50—
Results tracked464

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 45.2 (#72), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen3-1.7B
FrontierCode27%—
LMArena WebDev1397—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML60.3%—
LMArena Coding1438—
ALE-Bench1,189—

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 29.9 (#81), Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen3-1.7B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.4%
DeepResearch Bench36.3%—

Reasoning GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 30.4 (#85), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen3-1.7B
Chess Puzzles24%0%
ARC-AGI-218.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)61.8%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
CritPt10%—
Thematic Generalization61.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1424—
Mystery Game Puzzles11%—
DTBench80%—
LMCA40.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index148.84—
ForecastBench57—

Math GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 45.5 (#75), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen3-1.7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%8.1%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)51.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 49.8%—
ProofBench21%—
LMArena Math1419—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)28.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 51.5 (#67), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen3-1.7B
GPQA Diamond86.9%38%
SimpleQA Verified29.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.5%—
LMArena Expert1435—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 39.7 (#56), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Vision1245—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 51.9 (#96), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Non-English1405—
LMArena Chinese1446—
LMArena French1440—
LMArena German1409—
LMArena Japanese1374—
LMArena Korean1368—
LMArena Russian1417—
LMArena Spanish1405—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 74.1 (#102), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Instruction Following1405—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 43.0 (#112), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Longer Query1407—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 64.0 (#58), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Text1412—
LMArena Creative Writing1370—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1665—
LMArena Multi-Turn1429—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.4 mini better than Qwen3-1.7B?

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 mini and Qwen3-1.7B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 mini has 46 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper