Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-5.4 mini vs Qwen-14B

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

45.0

Rank #76 Confirmed

Qwen-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.4

Rank #275 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 mini scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.4 mini leads 64.0 to 27.6.
  • Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.4 miniQwen-14B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index45.031.4
Released2026-03-172023-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$4.50—
Results tracked4618

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 45.2 (#72), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen-14B
LMArena Coding14381071
FrontierCode27%—
LMArena WebDev1397—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML60.3%—
ALE-Bench1,189—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 29.9 (#81), Qwen-14B: —

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen-14B
DeepResearch Bench36.3%—

Reasoning GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 30.4 (#85), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen-14B
LMArena Hard Prompts14241027
Epoch Capabilities Index148.84113.03
ARC-AGI-218.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)61.8%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
CritPt10%—
Chess Puzzles24%—
Thematic Generalization61.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles11%—
DTBench80%—
LMCA40.8%—
BIG-Bench Hard—55%
ForecastBench57—
LAMBADA—71.1%
PIQA—79.9%

Math GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 45.5 (#75), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen-14B
LMArena Math14191068
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)51.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 49.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench21%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)28.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—
GSM8K—61.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 51.5 (#67), Qwen-14B: —

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen-14B
GPQA Diamond86.9%—
SimpleQA Verified29.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.5%—
LMArena Expert1435—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.4%
BoolQ—86.2%
MMLU—66.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 39.7 (#56), Qwen-14B: —

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen-14B
LMArena Vision1245—

Multilingual GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 51.9 (#96), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen-14B
LMArena Non-English14051041
LMArena Chinese14461077
LMArena French1440—
LMArena German1409—
LMArena Japanese1374—
LMArena Korean1368—
LMArena Russian1417—
LMArena Spanish1405—

Instruction Following GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 74.1 (#102), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen-14B
LMArena Instruction Following14051031

Long Context GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 43.0 (#112), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen-14B
LMArena Longer Query14071028

Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 64.0 (#58), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniQwen-14B
LMArena Text14121051
LMArena Creative Writing13701028
LMArena Multi-Turn14291022
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1665—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.4 mini better than Qwen-14B?

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.4 mini or Qwen-14B better for coding?

GPT-5.4 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.2 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 mini and Qwen-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 mini has 46 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper