Model comparison
GPT-5.4 mini vs Mistral Small 3.2
GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 13× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 mini's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 mini scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Small 3.2 in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5.4 mini leads 51.5 to 26.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 88.9% for GPT-5.4 mini and 30.3% for Mistral Small 3.2.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $4.50 for GPT-5.4 mini.
- GPT-5.4 mini accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 256K.
- Mistral Small 3.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 mini | Mistral Small 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 31.2 |
| Released | 2026-03-17 | 2025-06-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | 256K |
| Max output | 128K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.75 | $0.0938 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4.50 | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 46 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.4 mini: 45.2 (#72), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 27% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1397 | — |
| SciCode | 49.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 60.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1438 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,189 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.4 mini: 29.9 (#81), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 36.3% | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 30.4 (#85), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.9% | 40.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | 24% | 1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 148.84 | 131.74 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 61.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 63.7% | — |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 61.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1424 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 11% | — |
| DTBench | 80% | — |
| LMCA | 40.8% | — |
| ForecastBench | 57 | — |
Math GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 45.5 (#75), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | 30.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 51.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 9.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 21% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1419 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 28.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 51.5 (#67), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 86.9% | 49.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 29.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.4 mini: 39.7 (#56), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.4 mini: 51.9 (#96), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1446 | — |
| LMArena French | 1440 | — |
| LMArena German | 1409 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1374 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1368 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1405 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.4 mini: 74.1 (#102), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.4 mini: 43.0 (#112), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1407 | — |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 mini leads
GPT-5.4 mini: 64.0 (#58), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 mini | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1665 | 1255 |
| LMArena Text | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1370 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1429 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 mini better than Mistral Small 3.2?
GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 13× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 mini's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 mini or Mistral Small 3.2?
Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 mini lists at $0.75 and $4.50.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.4 mini does, with 400K tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 mini and Mistral Small 3.2 share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 mini has 46 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.