Model comparison

GPT-5.4 mini vs Mercury

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

45.0

Rank #76 Confirmed

Mercury Inception

37.6

Rank #199 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 mini scores higher in 6 categories and Mercury in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.4 mini leads 64.0 to 46.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 37.9% for GPT-5.4 mini and 21.6% for Mercury.

Side by side

GPT-5.4 mini and Mercury specifications
GPT-5.4 miniMercury
ProviderOpenAIInception
Noometry Index45.037.6
Released2026-03-17—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$4.50—
Results tracked469

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 45.2 (#72), Mercury: 38.7 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniMercury
LMArena Coding14381322
FrontierCode27%—
LMArena WebDev1397—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML60.3%—
ALE-Bench1,189—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 29.9 (#81), Mercury: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniMercury
DeepResearch Bench36.3%—

Reasoning GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 30.4 (#85), Mercury: 17.5 (#293)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniMercury
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.9%21.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts14241285
ARC-AGI-218.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)61.8%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
CritPt10%—
Chess Puzzles24%—
Thematic Generalization61.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles11%—
DTBench80%—
LMCA40.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index148.84—
ForecastBench57—

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 45.5 (#75), Mercury: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniMercury
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)51.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 49.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench21%—
LMArena Math1419—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)28.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 51.5 (#67), Mercury: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniMercury
GPQA Diamond86.9%—
SimpleQA Verified29.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.5%—
LMArena Expert1435—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 39.7 (#56), Mercury: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniMercury
LMArena Vision1245—

Multilingual GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 51.9 (#96), Mercury: 41.6 (#206)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniMercury
LMArena Non-English14051260
LMArena Chinese1446—
LMArena French1440—
LMArena German1409—
LMArena Japanese1374—
LMArena Korean1368—
LMArena Russian1417—
LMArena Spanish1405—

Instruction Following GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 74.1 (#102), Mercury: 65.2 (#224)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniMercury
LMArena Instruction Following14051239

Long Context GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 43.0 (#112), Mercury: 38.4 (#198)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniMercury
LMArena Longer Query14071266

Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 64.0 (#58), Mercury: 46.2 (#221)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniMercury
LMArena Text14121282
LMArena Creative Writing13701191
LMArena Multi-Turn14291282
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1665—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.4 mini better than Mercury?

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.4 mini or Mercury better for coding?

GPT-5.4 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.2 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 mini and Mercury share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 mini has 46 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper