Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-5.4 mini vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI

45.0

Rank #76 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 mini scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5.4 mini leads 51.5 to 37.0.

Side by side

GPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index45.041.3
Released2026-03-17—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$4.50—
Results tracked4616

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 45.2 (#72), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Coding14381361
FrontierCode27%—
LMArena WebDev1397—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML60.3%—
ALE-Bench1,189—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 29.9 (#81), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbos 20250226
DeepResearch Bench36.3%—

Reasoning GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 30.4 (#85), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Hard Prompts14241374
ARC-AGI-218.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)61.8%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
CritPt10%—
Chess Puzzles24%—
Thematic Generalization61.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles11%—
DTBench80%—
LMCA40.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index148.84—
ForecastBench57—

Math GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 45.5 (#75), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Math14191359
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)51.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 49.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench21%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)28.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 51.5 (#67), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Expert14351339
GPQA Diamond86.9%—
SimpleQA Verified29.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.4 mini: 39.7 (#56), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Vision1245—

Multilingual GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 51.9 (#96), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English14051363
LMArena Chinese14461417
LMArena French14401391
LMArena German14091355
LMArena Japanese13741342
LMArena Korean13681351
LMArena Russian14171368
LMArena Spanish1405—

Instruction Following GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 74.1 (#102), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following14051344

Long Context GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 43.0 (#112), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query14071366

Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 mini leads

GPT-5.4 mini: 64.0 (#58), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 miniHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text14121377
LMArena Creative Writing13701359
LMArena Multi-Turn14291387
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1665—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.4 mini better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.4 mini or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

GPT-5.4 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.2 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 mini and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 mini has 46 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper