Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Muse Glimmer

GPT-5.3 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.3 Codex OpenAI

45.8

Rank #69 Reported

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher in 1 category and Muse Glimmer in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.3 Codex leads 48.6 to 40.4.
  • Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.3 Codex and Muse Glimmer specifications
GPT-5.3 CodexMuse Glimmer
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Noometry Index45.841.7
Released2026-02-052026-08-10
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.75—
Output $ / M tokens$14—
Results tracked815

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.3 Codex leads

GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.6 (#56), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMuse Glimmer
LMArena WebDev14091355
SWE-bench Verified74.8%—
SciCode—44.9%
WeirdML79.3%—
LMArena Coding—1416
ALE-Bench1,655—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.0 (#9), Muse Glimmer: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMuse Glimmer
Terminal-Bench78.4%—
METR Time Horizons74.5%—
Vending-Bench 25,940—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMuse Glimmer
CritPt—2.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1396
Epoch Capabilities Index156.77—

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMuse Glimmer
LMArena Math—1417

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMuse Glimmer
LMArena Expert—1386

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMuse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English—1384
LMArena Chinese—1412
LMArena Russian—1390

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMuse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following—1375

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMuse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query—1382

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMuse Glimmer
LMArena Text—1389
LMArena Creative Writing—1339
LMArena Multi-Turn—1399

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.3 Codex better than Muse Glimmer?

GPT-5.3 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.3 Codex or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Codex and Muse Glimmer share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Codex has 8 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper