Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Ministral 8B

GPT-5.3 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 32× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.3 Codex OpenAI

45.8

Rank #69 Reported

Ministral 8B Mistral AI

28.2

Rank #325 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where GPT-5.3 Codex leads 48.0 to 16.4.
  • Ministral 8B is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.3 Codex.
  • GPT-5.3 Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 262K.
  • Ministral 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.3 Codex and Ministral 8B specifications
GPT-5.3 CodexMinistral 8B
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Noometry Index45.828.2
Released2026-02-052024-10-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K262K
Max output128K262K
Input $ / M tokens$1.75$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$14$0.15
Results tracked817

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.3 Codex leads

GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.6 (#56), Ministral 8B: 35.0 (#230)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMinistral 8B
SWE-bench Verified74.8%—
LMArena WebDev1409—
WeirdML79.3%—
LMArena Coding—1202
ALE-Bench1,655—

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-5.3 Codex leads

GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.0 (#9), Ministral 8B: 16.4 (#148)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMinistral 8B
Terminal-Bench78.4%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—11.1%
METR Time Horizons74.5%—
Vending-Bench 25,940—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Ministral 8B: 18.4 (#281)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMinistral 8B
LMArena Hard Prompts—1191
DTBench—45.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index156.77—

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Ministral 8B: 25.7 (#267)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMinistral 8B
LMArena Math—1188
MATH Level 5—14.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Ministral 8B: 12.6 (#297)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMinistral 8B
GPQA Diamond—27.1%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.4%
LMArena Expert—1170

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Ministral 8B: 35.1 (#247)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMinistral 8B
LMArena Non-English—1165
LMArena Chinese—1193
LMArena Russian—1195

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Ministral 8B: 60.5 (#250)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMinistral 8B
LMArena Instruction Following—1161

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#227)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMinistral 8B
LMArena Longer Query—1212

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Ministral 8B: 39.6 (#246)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMinistral 8B
LMArena Text—1191
LMArena Creative Writing—1175
LMArena Multi-Turn—1166

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.3 Codex better than Ministral 8B?

GPT-5.3 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 32× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Codex or Ministral 8B?

Ministral 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; GPT-5.3 Codex lists at $1.75 and $14.

Is GPT-5.3 Codex or Ministral 8B better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 35.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.3 Codex does, with 400K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Codex and Ministral 8B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Codex has 8 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 8B has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper