Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Codex vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 45.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.3 Codex OpenAI

45.8

Rank #69 Reported

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 53.4 to 48.6.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.3 Codex.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 400K.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.3 Codex and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
GPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderOpenAIXiaomi
Noometry Index45.848.5
Released2026-02-052026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K1.05M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$1.75$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$14$0.28
Results tracked819

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.6 (#56), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev14091637
SWE-bench Verified74.8%—
SciCode—51.3%
WeirdML79.3%—
LMArena Coding—1504
ALE-Bench1,655—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.0 (#9), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Terminal-Bench78.4%—
METR Time Horizons74.5%—
Vending-Bench 25,940—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2.6-Flash
CritPt—12%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1482
Epoch Capabilities Index156.77—

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProofBench—63%
LMArena Math—1468

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert—1501

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English—1434
LMArena Chinese—1511
LMArena French—1475
LMArena Russian—1409
LMArena Spanish—1456

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1463

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1463

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text—1455
LMArena Creative Writing—1400
LMArena Multi-Turn—1451

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.3 Codex better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 45.8 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Codex or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; GPT-5.3 Codex lists at $1.75 and $14.

Is GPT-5.3 Codex or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 48.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Codex and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Codex has 8 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper