Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Magistral Medium

GPT-5.3 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index. Magistral Medium costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.3 Codex OpenAI

45.8

Rank #69 Reported

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

35.2

Rank #227 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.3 Codex leads 48.6 to 39.1.
  • Magistral Medium is cheaper at $2 / $5 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.3 Codex.
  • GPT-5.3 Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 262K.
  • Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.3 Codex and Magistral Medium specifications
GPT-5.3 CodexMagistral Medium
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Noometry Index45.835.2
Released2026-02-052025-03-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K262K
Max output128K16K
Input $ / M tokens$1.75$2
Output $ / M tokens$14$5
Results tracked822

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.3 Codex leads

GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.6 (#56), Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMagistral Medium
SWE-bench Verified74.8%—
LMArena WebDev1409—
SciCode—39.2%
WeirdML79.3%—
LMArena Coding—1319
ALE-Bench1,655—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.0 (#9), Magistral Medium: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMagistral Medium
Terminal-Bench78.4%—
METR Time Horizons74.5%—
Vending-Bench 25,940—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMagistral Medium
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—16.2%
ARC-AGI-1—6.1%
CritPt—0.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1267
Epoch Capabilities Index156.77—

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMagistral Medium
LMArena Math—1250

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMagistral Medium
LMArena Expert—1223

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMagistral Medium
LMArena Non-English—1232
LMArena Chinese—1227
LMArena French—1267
LMArena German—1248
LMArena Japanese—1175
LMArena Korean—1125
LMArena Russian—1224
LMArena Spanish—1271

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMagistral Medium
LMArena Instruction Following—1254

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMagistral Medium
LMArena Longer Query—1295

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexMagistral Medium
LMArena Text—1255
LMArena Creative Writing—1245
LMArena Multi-Turn—1275

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.3 Codex better than Magistral Medium?

GPT-5.3 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index. Magistral Medium costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Codex or Magistral Medium?

Magistral Medium is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens; GPT-5.3 Codex lists at $1.75 and $14.

Is GPT-5.3 Codex or Magistral Medium better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.3 Codex does, with 400K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Codex and Magistral Medium share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Codex has 8 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper