Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Llama 2-13B

GPT-5.3 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.3 Codex OpenAI

45.8

Rank #69 Reported

Llama 2-13B Meta

29.6

Rank #309 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher in 1 category and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.3 Codex leads 48.6 to 30.9.
  • Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.3 Codex and Llama 2-13B specifications
GPT-5.3 CodexLlama 2-13B
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Noometry Index45.829.6
Released2026-02-052023-07-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.75—
Output $ / M tokens$14—
Results tracked832

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.3 Codex leads

GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.6 (#56), Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexLlama 2-13B
SWE-bench Verified74.8%—
LMArena WebDev1409—
WeirdML79.3%—
LMArena Coding—1062
ALE-Bench1,655—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: 48.0 (#9), Llama 2-13B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexLlama 2-13B
Terminal-Bench78.4%—
METR Time Horizons74.5%—
Vending-Bench 25,940—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexLlama 2-13B
Epoch Capabilities Index156.77106.17
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1051
DTBench—42.2%
BIG-Bench Hard—58.2%
HellaSwag—80.7%
LAMBADA—76.5%
PIQA—80.8%
WinoGrande—72.8%

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexLlama 2-13B
LMArena Math—1065
GSM8K—36.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexLlama 2-13B
LMArena Expert—1030
ARC (AI2) Challenge—60.3%
BoolQ—82.4%
MMLU—55.6%
OpenBookQA—57%
TriviaQA—79.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Llama 2-13B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexLlama 2-13B
ScienceQA—55.8%

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexLlama 2-13B
LMArena Non-English—1024
LMArena Chinese—1001
LMArena French—1044
LMArena German—1009
LMArena Japanese—894
LMArena Korean—953
LMArena Russian—1055
LMArena Spanish—1087

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexLlama 2-13B
LMArena Instruction Following—1045

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexLlama 2-13B
LMArena Longer Query—1064

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Codex: —, Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexLlama 2-13B
LMArena Text—1084
LMArena Creative Writing—1047
LMArena Multi-Turn—1050

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.3 Codex better than Llama 2-13B?

GPT-5.3 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.3 Codex or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Codex and Llama 2-13B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Codex has 8 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper