Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Chat vs Wizardlm 70b

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.3 Chat OpenAI

42.8

Rank #109 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 63.1 to 34.8.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.3 Chat and Wizardlm 70b specifications
GPT-5.3 ChatWizardlm 70b
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index42.833.0
Released2026-03-03—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window128K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.75—
Output $ / M tokens$14—
Results tracked1812

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 41.4 (#124), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding14081081

Reasoning GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 28.5 (#102), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatWizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts13991079

Math GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#142), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatWizardlm 70b
LMArena Math13891116

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.8 (#140), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatWizardlm 70b
LMArena Expert1397—

Multilingual GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.3 (#124), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English13821078
LMArena Chinese14321052
LMArena German13841083
LMArena Russian14001155
LMArena French1397—
LMArena Japanese1352—
LMArena Korean1346—
LMArena Spanish1371—

Instruction Following GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 72.8 (#129), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following13781093

Long Context GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#120), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query13961097

Writing & Preference GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.1 (#68), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text13891120
LMArena Creative Writing13551149
LMArena Multi-Turn14121108
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1690—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than Wizardlm 70b?

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.3 Chat or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper