Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Chat vs Qwen2-72B

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.3 Chat OpenAI

42.1

Rank #109 Confirmed

Qwen2-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

29.5

Rank #294 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 63.3 to 41.0.
  • Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.3 Chat and Qwen2-72B specifications
GPT-5.3 ChatQwen2-72B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.129.5
Released2026-03-032024-06-07
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window128K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.75—
Output $ / M tokens$14—
Results tracked1826

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 40.8 (#124), Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatQwen2-72B
LMArena Coding14081196
WeirdML—11.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.5%
BigCodeBench Complete—54%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Chat: —, Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatQwen2-72B
TheAgentCompany—1.1%
METR Time Horizons—29.9%

Reasoning GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 27.3 (#105), Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatQwen2-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts13991191
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.27

Math GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 35.4 (#146), Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatQwen2-72B
LMArena Math13891235
MATH Level 5—39.1%

Knowledge GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#137), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatQwen2-72B
LMArena Expert13971171
GPQA Diamond—40.8%
MMLU—82.4%

Multilingual GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.5 (#119), Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatQwen2-72B
LMArena Non-English13831176
LMArena Chinese14331240
LMArena French13981169
LMArena German13841151
LMArena Japanese13511111
LMArena Korean13471083
LMArena Russian14001169
LMArena Spanish13711168

Instruction Following GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 73.0 (#124), Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatQwen2-72B
LMArena Instruction Following13781181

Long Context GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#115), Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatQwen2-72B
LMArena Longer Query13961193

Writing & Preference GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.3 (#65), Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatQwen2-72B
LMArena Text13891203
LMArena Creative Writing13561181
LMArena Multi-Turn14131195
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1690—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than Qwen2-72B?

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.3 Chat or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and Qwen2-72B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper