Model comparison
GPT-5.3 Chat vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 38.8 to 18.3.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.3 Chat | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-03-03 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.75 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $14 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 41.4 (#124), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1408 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 28.5 (#102), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#142), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1389 | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.8 (#140), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.3 (#124), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1432 | — |
| LMArena French | 1397 | — |
| LMArena German | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1352 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1346 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1371 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 72.8 (#129), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1378 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#120), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1396 | — |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.1 (#68), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1355 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1690 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1412 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.3 Chat or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.