Model comparison
GPT-5.3 Chat vs Mistral Medium 3.5
GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Medium 3.5 costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Chat's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 27.3 to 16.6.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper at $1.50 / $7.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.3 Chat.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.3 Chat | Mistral Medium 3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2026-03-03 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 262K |
| Max output | 16K | 210K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.75 | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $14 | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 40.8 (#124), Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1408 | 1461 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1263 |
Reasoning GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 27.3 (#105), Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1436 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 12.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.42 |
Math Too close to call
GPT-5.3 Chat: 35.4 (#146), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1389 | 1432 |
Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#137), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | 1431 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.3 Chat: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1222 |
Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.5 (#119), Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1383 | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1433 | 1443 |
| LMArena French | 1398 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1384 | 1453 |
| LMArena Korean | 1347 | 1387 |
| LMArena Russian | 1400 | 1396 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1371 | 1406 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1351 | — |
Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 73.0 (#124), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1378 | 1414 |
Long Context Too close to call
GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#115), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1396 | 1414 |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.3 Chat leads
GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.3 (#65), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Chat | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1356 | 1372 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1413 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1690 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than Mistral Medium 3.5?
GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Medium 3.5 costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Chat's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Chat or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper. It lists at $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; GPT-5.3 Chat lists at $1.75 and $14.
Is GPT-5.3 Chat or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?
GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 35.7 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Medium 3.5 does, with 262K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.