Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Chat vs MiMo-V2-Omni

GPT-5.3 Chat and MiMo-V2-Omni score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.8 vs 43.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.3 Chat OpenAI

42.8

Rank #109 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Omni in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.3 Chat.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

GPT-5.3 Chat and MiMo-V2-Omni specifications
GPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2-Omni
ProviderOpenAIXiaomi
Noometry Index42.843.6
Released2026-03-032026-03-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K262K
Max output16K131K
Input $ / M tokens$1.75$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$14$0.28
Results tracked1818

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 41.4 (#124), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Coding14081466

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 28.5 (#102), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Hard Prompts13991445

Math Too close to call

GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#142), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Math13891430

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.8 (#140), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Expert13971449

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Chat: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Vision—1228

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.3 (#124), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Non-English13821404
LMArena Chinese14321465
LMArena French13971447
LMArena German13841399
LMArena Japanese13521317
LMArena Korean13461355
LMArena Russian14001412
LMArena Spanish13711434

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 72.8 (#129), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Instruction Following13781428

Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#120), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Longer Query13961442

Writing & Preference GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.1 (#68), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Text13891423
LMArena Creative Writing13551392
LMArena Multi-Turn14121445
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1690—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

GPT-5.3 Chat and MiMo-V2-Omni score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.8 vs 43.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Chat or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; GPT-5.3 Chat lists at $1.75 and $14.

Is GPT-5.3 Chat or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 41.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper