Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Chat vs MiMo-V2.5

GPT-5.3 Chat and MiMo-V2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.8 vs 43.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.3 Chat OpenAI

42.8

Rank #109 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.4

Rank #93 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.3 Chat.
  • MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.3 Chat and MiMo-V2.5 specifications
GPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2.5
ProviderOpenAIXiaomi
Noometry Index42.843.4
Released2026-03-032026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window128K1.05M
Max output16K131K
Input $ / M tokens$1.75$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$14$0.28
Results tracked1823

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 41.4 (#124), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Coding14081469
LMArena WebDev—1438
SciCode—43.1%
ALE-Bench—513.95

Reasoning Too close to call

GPT-5.3 Chat: 28.5 (#102), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Hard Prompts13991450
CritPt—3.7%

Math GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#142), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Math13891436
ProofBench—16%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.8 (#140), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Expert13971460

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Chat: —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision—1247

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.3 (#124), MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Non-English13821404
LMArena Chinese14321468
LMArena French13971447
LMArena German13841421
LMArena Japanese13521306
LMArena Korean13461363
LMArena Russian14001395
LMArena Spanish13711416

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 72.8 (#129), MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Instruction Following13781434

Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#120), MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Longer Query13961445

Writing & Preference GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.1 (#68), MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text13891428
LMArena Creative Writing13551393
LMArena Multi-Turn14121445
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1690—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than MiMo-V2.5?

GPT-5.3 Chat and MiMo-V2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.8 vs 43.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Chat or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; GPT-5.3 Chat lists at $1.75 and $14.

Is GPT-5.3 Chat or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 41.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and MiMo-V2.5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper