Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Chat vs Granite 3.0 8b Instruct

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 31.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.3 Chat OpenAI

42.1

Rank #109 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.1

Rank #266 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 63.3 to 31.2.
  • Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.3 Chat and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct specifications
GPT-5.3 ChatGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
ProviderOpenAIIBM
Noometry Index42.131.1
Released2026-03-03—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window128K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.75—
Output $ / M tokens$14—
Results tracked1814

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 40.8 (#124), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#297)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Coding14081113
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—35.4%

Reasoning GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 27.3 (#105), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.0 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13991092

Math GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 35.4 (#146), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 30.3 (#211)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Math13891143

Knowledge GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#137), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#233)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Expert13971087

Multilingual GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.5 (#119), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.4 (#271)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13831037
LMArena Chinese14331063
LMArena Russian14001060
LMArena French1398—
LMArena German1384—
LMArena Japanese1351—
LMArena Korean1347—
LMArena Spanish1371—

Instruction Following GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 73.0 (#124), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.2 (#271)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13781088

Long Context GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#115), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#247)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13961122

Writing & Preference GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.3 (#65), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.2 (#280)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Text13891096
LMArena Creative Writing13561071
LMArena Multi-Turn14131063
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1690—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than Granite 3.0 8b Instruct?

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 31.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.3 Chat or Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper