Model comparison
GPT-5.2 vs Grok-2 (Dec 2024)
GPT-5.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.2 scores higher in 8 categories and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 leads 60.0 to 20.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 96.1% for GPT-5.2 and 11.5% for Grok-2 (Dec 2024).
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 54.1 | 33.7 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2024-08-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.75 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $14 | — |
| Results tracked | 67 | 34 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.2 leads
GPT-5.2: 51.6 (#37), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 72.2% | 22.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1287 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.8% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 72.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1416 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 66.7% | — |
| GSO | 27.4% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 46.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,294 | — |
| AlgoTune | 2.05 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.2: 40.2 (#24), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 64.9% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 55.9% | — |
| GDPval | 49.7% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 2.5% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | 83% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 32.2% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 81.6% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 89.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 41.1% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1207 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 75.3% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,591 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 leads
GPT-5.2: 50.2 (#35), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 45.8% | 22.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1272 |
| DTBench | 90.9% | 65.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.45 | 130.48 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 52.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 73.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 83.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 86.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 49% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 10.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 23% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 54.8% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 23% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 54.5% |
| LMCA | 43.9% | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.1 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 54.3% |
Math GPT-5.2 leads
GPT-5.2: 60.0 (#38), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 96.1% | 11.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1283 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 40.7% | 0.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 67.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 31.7% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 72% | — |
| ProofBench | 15% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 54.9% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 63.5% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 18.8% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.2 leads
GPT-5.2: 59.3 (#32), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 91.4% | 53.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | 1254 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 27.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 37.1% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 20.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.2: 51.3 (#7), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |
| VPCT | 84% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 38.3% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1405 | — |
Multilingual GPT-5.2 leads
GPT-5.2: 53.4 (#67), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1282 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1460 | 1289 |
| LMArena French | 1455 | 1318 |
| LMArena German | 1448 | 1287 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1420 | 1244 |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | 1237 |
| LMArena Russian | 1440 | 1286 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1433 | 1281 |
Instruction Following GPT-5.2 leads
GPT-5.2: 74.7 (#89), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1417 | 1270 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 69.6% |
Long Context GPT-5.2 leads
GPT-5.2: 44.0 (#78), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1276 |
| CL-bench | 18.2% | — |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.2 leads
GPT-5.2: 66.8 (#32), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 1305 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1284 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1458 | 1290 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 63.6% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1703 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 45.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 better than Grok-2 (Dec 2024)?
GPT-5.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.2 or Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better for coding?
GPT-5.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) share?
24 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 has 67 scored results on Noometry and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34.