Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Ring-2.6-1T
GPT-5.2 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#39); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 51.5 to 26.1.
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 36.9 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33), Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.4 | — |
Math Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Ring-2.6-1T?
GPT-5.2 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#39); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Ring-2.6-1T share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.