Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 1050× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 38.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 74% for GPT-5.2 Pro and 19.3% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 400K.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | 43.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.4 | 144.64 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | 19.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 1050× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.