Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs phi-3-medium 14B
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 1 category and phi-3-medium 14B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 27.3.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.4 | 121.23 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than phi-3-medium 14B?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and phi-3-medium 14B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.