Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Llama 2-34B
GPT-5.2 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#34); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 2-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | — |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | 104.81 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 44.1% |
| PIQA | — | 81.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 76.7% |
Math Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 42.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 54.5% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.7% |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.2% |
| TriviaQA | — | 84.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Llama 2-34B?
GPT-5.2 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#34); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Llama 2-34B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-34B has 10.