Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 37.5.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1361 |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1374 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.4 | — |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1359 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1339 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1417 |
| LMArena French | — | 1391 |
| LMArena German | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1368 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1344 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1366 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1387 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.