Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Granite 4.1 8b
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 36.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 33.8.
- Granite 4.1 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Granite 4.1 8b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | 36.8 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Granite 4.1 8b: 29.9 (#291)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1190 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1313 |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31), Granite 4.1 8b: 24.6 (#142)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1294 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | — |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23), Granite 4.1 8b: 33.8 (#167)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1311 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Granite 4.1 8b: 35.5 (#171)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1310 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Granite 4.1 8b: 41.8 (#199)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1261 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1335 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1238 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Granite 4.1 8b: 67.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1268 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#188)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1275 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Granite 4.1 8b: 48.3 (#199)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Granite 4.1 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1291 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1249 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1269 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Granite 4.1 8b?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 36.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Granite 4.1 8b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.1 8b has 13.