Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs GPT-5.5 Instant
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and GPT-5.5 Instant in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 26.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 74% for GPT-5.2 Pro and 26.3% for GPT-5.5 Instant.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.5 Instant | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2026-05-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.7 (#73)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 48.6% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1433 |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31), GPT-5.5 Instant: 24.2 (#149)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | 142.48 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1426 |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23), GPT-5.5 Instant: 26.1 (#241)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | 26.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | 2.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 68.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1420 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, GPT-5.5 Instant: 48.9 (#68)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1409 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, GPT-5.5 Instant: 39.3 (#48)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1250 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1403 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, GPT-5.5 Instant: 53.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1457 |
| LMArena French | — | 1428 |
| LMArena German | — | 1410 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1408 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1430 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1430 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, GPT-5.5 Instant: 74.4 (#94)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1407 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.4 (#92)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1422 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, GPT-5.5 Instant: 62.0 (#81)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1419 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1420 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1434 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than GPT-5.5 Instant?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and GPT-5.5 Instant share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.5 Instant has 27.