Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Codex vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where GPT-5.2 Codex leads 41.0 to 18.6.
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct is cheaper at $2.80 / $8.40 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.2 Codex.
- GPT-5.2 Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Codex | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.6 | 29.9 |
| Released | 2025-12-18 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | 131K |
| Max output | 128K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.75 | $2.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $14 | $8.40 |
| Results tracked | 5 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Codex: 45.5 (#71), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 72.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1339 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 66.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,300 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use GPT-5.2 Codex leads
GPT-5.2 Codex: 41.0 (#22), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 66.5% | — |
| OSWorld | — | 5% |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Codex better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Codex or Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $2.80 per million input tokens and $8.40 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Codex lists at $1.75 and $14.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.2 Codex does, with 400K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Codex and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Codex has 5 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.