Model comparison

GPT-5.2 Codex vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.2 Codex OpenAI

42.6

Rank #111 Reported

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.2 Codex leads 45.5 to 26.6.
  • Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.2 Codex and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
GPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index42.627.9
Released2025-12-182024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.75—
Output $ / M tokens$14—
Results tracked535

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.2 Codex leads

GPT-5.2 Codex: 45.5 (#71), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)72.8%—
LMArena WebDev1339—
SWE-bench Multilingual66.3%—
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
LMArena Coding—1093
ALE-Bench1,300—
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: 41.0 (#22), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
Terminal-Bench66.5%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1072
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Math—15.7%
LMArena Math—1111

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert—1045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1021
LMArena Chinese—1021
LMArena French—1076
LMArena German—1044
LMArena Japanese—935
LMArena Korean—905
LMArena Russian—1022
LMArena Spanish—1085

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%
LMArena Instruction Following—1053

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1044

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text—1073
LMArena Creative Writing—1037
LMArena Multi-Turn—1018
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.2 Codex better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.2 Codex or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.5 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Codex and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Codex has 5 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper