Model comparison

GPT-5.2 Codex vs Mistral Small 3

GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3 costs 84× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.2 Codex OpenAI

42.6

Rank #111 Reported

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #278 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.2 Codex leads 45.5 to 36.5.
  • Mistral Small 3 is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.2 Codex.
  • GPT-5.2 Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 33K.
  • Mistral Small 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.2 Codex and Mistral Small 3 specifications
GPT-5.2 CodexMistral Small 3
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Noometry Index42.631.2
Released2025-12-182025-01-30
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K33K
Max output128K16K
Input $ / M tokens$1.75$0.05
Output $ / M tokens$14$0.08
Results tracked524

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.2 Codex leads

GPT-5.2 Codex: 45.5 (#71), Mistral Small 3: 36.5 (#207)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexMistral Small 3
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)72.8%—
LMArena WebDev1339—
SWE-bench Multilingual66.3%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.3%
LMArena Coding—1246
BigCodeBench Complete—50.4%
ALE-Bench1,300—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: 41.0 (#22), Mistral Small 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexMistral Small 3
Terminal-Bench66.5%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Mistral Small 3: 18.9 (#273)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexMistral Small 3
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1233
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.07

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Mistral Small 3: 16.3 (#295)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexMistral Small 3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—6.7%
LMArena Math—1240

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Mistral Small 3: 25.1 (#263)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexMistral Small 3
GPQA Diamond—47.3%
Confabulations—25.2%
LMArena Expert—1202

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Mistral Small 3: 37.3 (#236)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexMistral Small 3
LMArena Non-English—1198
LMArena Chinese—1204
LMArena French—1203
LMArena German—1211
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1188
LMArena Russian—1216

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Mistral Small 3: 63.7 (#229)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexMistral Small 3
LMArena Instruction Following—1214

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#211)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexMistral Small 3
LMArena Longer Query—1246

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Mistral Small 3: 32.2 (#280)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexMistral Small 3
LMArena Text—1234
LMArena Creative Writing—1195
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—707
LMArena Multi-Turn—1217

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.2 Codex better than Mistral Small 3?

GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3 costs 84× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Codex or Mistral Small 3?

Mistral Small 3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Codex lists at $1.75 and $14.

Is GPT-5.2 Codex or Mistral Small 3 better for coding?

GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.5 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.2 Codex does, with 400K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Codex and Mistral Small 3 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Codex has 5 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3 has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper