Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Codex vs Llama 13b
GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.2 Codex leads 45.4 to 20.9.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Codex | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 42.2 | 23.9 |
| Released | 2025-12-18 | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.75 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $14 | — |
| Results tracked | 5 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.2 Codex leads
GPT-5.2 Codex: 45.4 (#66), Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 72.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1339 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 66.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 683 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,300 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Codex: 40.7 (#20), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 66.5% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.09 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 819 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 781 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 753 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Codex better than Llama 13b?
GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.2 Codex or Llama 13b better for coding?
GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.4 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Codex and Llama 13b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Codex has 5 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.