Model comparison

GPT-5.1 vs video-SALMONN 2+

GPT-5.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#47); video-SALMONN 2+ does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.1 OpenAI

48.8

Rank #47 Confirmed

video-SALMONN 2+ ByteDance Seed

40.8

Unranked Sparse

Side by side

GPT-5.1 and video-SALMONN 2+ specifications
GPT-5.1video-SALMONN 2+
ProviderOpenAIByteDance Seed
Noometry Index48.840.8
Released2025-11-132025-06-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked631

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5.1: 46.9 (#59), video-SALMONN 2+: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1video-SALMONN 2+
SWE-bench Verified68%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)66%—
LMArena WebDev1395—
SciCode43.3%—
GSO13.7%—
WeirdML60.8%—
LiveBench Coding72.5%—
LMArena Coding1454—
ALE-Bench1,192—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.1: 32.5 (#55), video-SALMONN 2+: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1video-SALMONN 2+
Terminal-Bench47.6%—
DeepResearch Bench42.8%—
LMArena Search1199—
Vending-Bench 21,473—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.1: 39.9 (#50), video-SALMONN 2+: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1video-SALMONN 2+
ARC-AGI-217.6%—
SimpleBench53.2%—
ARC-AGI-172.8%—
CritPt4.9%—
Chess Puzzles32%—
EnigmaEval11.2%—
LiveBench Reasoning95.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1457—
Mystery Game Puzzles19%—
DTBench90.1%—
LiveBench Data Analysis72.1%—
LMCA43.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.66—
ForecastBench58.1—
LiveBench78.8%—

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.1: 50.3 (#45), video-SALMONN 2+: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1video-SALMONN 2+
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.6%—
Omni-MATH46.4%—
LiveBench Math94.5%—
LMArena Math1446—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)31%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)12.5%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.1: 50.5 (#65), video-SALMONN 2+: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1video-SALMONN 2+
GPQA Diamond87.6%—
Humanity's Last Exam23.7%—
SimpleQA Verified48%—
MMLU-Pro57.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.9%—
GPQA (HELM)44.2%—
LMArena Expert1470—

Multimodal GPT-5.1 leads

GPT-5.1: 44.0 (#17), video-SALMONN 2+: 41.7

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1video-SALMONN 2+
LMArena Vision1250—
Video-MME—79.7%
VPCT58.7%—
LMArena Document1403—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.1: 54.0 (#51), video-SALMONN 2+: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1video-SALMONN 2+
LMArena Non-English1431—
LMArena Chinese1495—
LMArena French1451—
LMArena German1439—
LMArena Japanese1453—
LMArena Korean1401—
LMArena Russian1435—
LMArena Spanish1430—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.1: 84.0 (#1), video-SALMONN 2+: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1video-SALMONN 2+
LiveBench Instruction Following93.3%—
IFEval93.5%—
LMArena Instruction Following1442—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.1: 47.6 (#14), video-SALMONN 2+: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1video-SALMONN 2+
CL-bench23.7%—
CL-bench Life17.3%—
LMArena Longer Query1448—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.1: 64.7 (#53), video-SALMONN 2+: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1video-SALMONN 2+
LMArena Text1443—
LMArena Creative Writing1427—
WildBench86.3%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1449—
LiveBench Language80.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.1 better than video-SALMONN 2+?

GPT-5.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#47); video-SALMONN 2+ does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.1 and video-SALMONN 2+ share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.1 has 63 scored results on Noometry and video-SALMONN 2+ has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper