Model comparison

GPT-5.1 vs Phi-3.5-MoE

GPT-5.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#53); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.1 OpenAI

49.0

Rank #53 Confirmed

Phi-3.5-MoE Microsoft

—

Unranked

Summary

  • Phi-3.5-MoE has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.1 and Phi-3.5-MoE specifications
GPT-5.1Phi-3.5-MoE
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index49.0—
Released2025-11-132024-08-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked633

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5.1: 46.4 (#66), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Phi-3.5-MoE
SWE-bench Verified68%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)66%—
LMArena WebDev1395—
SciCode43.3%—
GSO13.7%—
WeirdML60.8%—
LiveBench Coding72.5%—
LMArena Coding1454—
ALE-Bench1,192—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.1: 32.7 (#60), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Phi-3.5-MoE
Terminal-Bench47.6%—
DeepResearch Bench42.8%—
LMArena Search1199—
Vending-Bench 21,473—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.1: 39.8 (#58), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Phi-3.5-MoE
ARC-AGI-217.6%—
SimpleBench53.2%—
ARC-AGI-172.8%—
CritPt4.9%—
Chess Puzzles32%—
EnigmaEval11.2%—
LiveBench Reasoning95.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1457—
Mystery Game Puzzles19%—
DTBench90.1%—
LiveBench Data Analysis72.1%—
LMCA43.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.64—
ForecastBench58.1—
LiveBench78.8%—
PIQA—88.6%

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.1: 52.2 (#51), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Phi-3.5-MoE
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.6%—
Omni-MATH46.4%—
LiveBench Math94.5%—
LMArena Math1447—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)31%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)12.5%—
GSM8K—88.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.1: 50.6 (#71), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Phi-3.5-MoE
GPQA Diamond87.6%—
Humanity's Last Exam23.7%—
SimpleQA Verified48%—
MMLU-Pro57.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.9%—
GPQA (HELM)44.2%—
LMArena Expert1470—
BoolQ—84.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.1: 44.8 (#19), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Phi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Vision1250—
VPCT58.7%—
LMArena Document1403—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.1: 53.8 (#56), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Phi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Non-English1431—
LMArena Chinese1495—
LMArena French1450—
LMArena German1438—
LMArena Japanese1453—
LMArena Korean1401—
LMArena Russian1435—
LMArena Spanish1433—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.1: 83.9 (#1), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Phi-3.5-MoE
LiveBench Instruction Following93.3%—
IFEval93.5%—
LMArena Instruction Following1443—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.1: 47.6 (#14), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Phi-3.5-MoE
CL-bench23.7%—
CL-bench Life17.3%—
LMArena Longer Query1447—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.1: 64.5 (#55), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Phi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Text1443—
LMArena Creative Writing1427—
WildBench86.3%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1450—
LiveBench Language80.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.1 better than Phi-3.5-MoE?

GPT-5.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#53); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.1 and Phi-3.5-MoE share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.1 has 63 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-MoE has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper