Model comparison
GPT-5.1-Codex vs Wizardlm 70b
GPT-5.1-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.1-Codex leads 41.9 to 31.4.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.1-Codex | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2025-11-12 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.1-Codex leads
GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.9 (#116), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 66% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1081 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,245 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: 38.0 (#33), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 60.4% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 70.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1079 |
Math Wizardlm 70b leads
GPT-5.1-Codex: 30.3 (#235), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1093 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Wizardlm 70b?
GPT-5.1-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.1-Codex or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
GPT-5.1-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.1-Codex and Wizardlm 70b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.1-Codex has 6 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.