Model comparison

GPT-5.1-Codex vs Mixtral 8x22B

GPT-5.1-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.2 to 26.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.1-Codex OpenAI

38.2

Rank #178 Reported

Mixtral 8x22B Mistral AI

26.7

Rank #330 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.1-Codex leads 41.7 to 23.8.
  • Mixtral 8x22B is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for GPT-5.1-Codex.
  • GPT-5.1-Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 64K.
  • Mixtral 8x22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.1-Codex and Mixtral 8x22B specifications
GPT-5.1-CodexMixtral 8x22B
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Noometry Index38.226.7
Released2025-11-122024-04-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K64K
Max output128K64K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$2
Output $ / M tokens$10$6
Results tracked634

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.1-Codex leads

GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.7 (#107), Mixtral 8x22B: 23.8 (#324)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexMixtral 8x22B
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)66%—
LMArena WebDev1337—
WeirdML—3.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—40.6%
LMArena Coding—1166
BigCodeBench Complete—50.2%
ALE-Bench1,245—
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—64.3%

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-5.1-Codex leads

GPT-5.1-Codex: 37.8 (#32), Mixtral 8x22B: 22.8 (#119)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexMixtral 8x22B
Terminal-Bench60.4%—
Cybench—7.5%
METR Time Horizons70.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 19.1 (#246)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Hard Prompts—1150
DTBench—55.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122
ForecastBench—56.3

Math GPT-5.1-Codex leads

GPT-5.1-Codex: 29.3 (#218), Mixtral 8x22B: 21.2 (#271)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexMixtral 8x22B
ProofBench9%—
Omni-MATH—16.3%
LMArena Math—1184
MATH Level 5—24.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#288)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexMixtral 8x22B
GPQA Diamond—34.1%
MMLU-Pro—46%
GPQA (HELM)—33.4%
LMArena Expert—1113
MMLU—77.8%

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 32.9 (#250)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Non-English—1128
LMArena Chinese—1116
LMArena French—1165
LMArena German—1141
LMArena Japanese—1037
LMArena Korean—1056
LMArena Russian—1158
LMArena Spanish—1150

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 57.9 (#261)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexMixtral 8x22B
IFEval—72.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1147

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 34.6 (#242)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Longer Query—1144

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 37.1 (#257)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Text—1162
LMArena Creative Writing—1141
WildBench—71.1%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1130

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Mixtral 8x22B?

GPT-5.1-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.2 to 26.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex or Mixtral 8x22B?

Mixtral 8x22B is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1-Codex lists at $1.25 and $10.

Is GPT-5.1-Codex or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?

GPT-5.1-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.7 versus 23.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.1-Codex does, with 400K tokens against 64K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.1-Codex and Mixtral 8x22B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.1-Codex has 6 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper