Model comparison
GPT-5.1-Codex vs Mistral Medium 3.1
GPT-5.1-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Medium 3.1 costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.1-Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper at $0.40 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for GPT-5.1-Codex.
- GPT-5.1-Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| GPT-5.1-Codex | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2025-11-12 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | 131K |
| Max output | 128K | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $2 |
| Results tracked | 6 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.9 (#116), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 66% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1337 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,245 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: 38.0 (#33), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 60.4% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 70.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
Math Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: 30.3 (#235), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 9% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1476 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
GPT-5.1-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Medium 3.1 costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.1-Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex or Mistral Medium 3.1?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1-Codex lists at $1.25 and $10.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.1-Codex does, with 400K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.1-Codex and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.1-Codex has 6 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.