Model comparison

GPT-5.1-Codex vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.1-Codex OpenAI

38.6

Rank #186 Reported

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

46.2

Rank #65 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 39.4 to 30.3.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper at $1.25 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for GPT-5.1-Codex.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 400K.

Side by side

GPT-5.1-Codex and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent specifications
GPT-5.1-CodexGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
ProviderOpenAIxAI
Noometry Index38.646.2
Released2025-11-122026-03-09
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window400K1M
Max output128K30K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$1.25
Output $ / M tokens$10$2.50
Results tracked620

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.9 (#116), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)66%—
LMArena WebDev1337—
LMArena Coding—1457
ALE-Bench1,245—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: 38.0 (#33), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Terminal-Bench60.4%—
LMArena Search—1204
METR Time Horizons70.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1448

Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

GPT-5.1-Codex: 30.3 (#235), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
ProofBench9%—
LMArena Math—1442

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Expert—1445

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Non-English—1440
LMArena Chinese—1475
LMArena French—1466
LMArena German—1456
LMArena Japanese—1405
LMArena Korean—1416
LMArena Russian—1457
LMArena Spanish—1447

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Instruction Following—1420

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Longer Query—1431

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Text—1450
LMArena Creative Writing—1436
LMArena Multi-Turn—1452

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1-Codex lists at $1.25 and $10.

Is GPT-5.1-Codex or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 41.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent does, with 1M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.1-Codex and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.1-Codex has 6 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper