Model comparison
GPT-5.1-Codex vs Granite 4.2 30b
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 4.2 30b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2025-11-12 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.9 (#116), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 66% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1396 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,245 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: 38.0 (#33), Granite 4.2 30b: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 60.4% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 70.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1374 |
Math Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: 30.3 (#235), Granite 4.2 30b: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 9% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1406 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1414 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1343 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1347 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1359 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1361 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1339 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Granite 4.2 30b?
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.1-Codex or Granite 4.2 30b better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (41.9 vs 41.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.1-Codex and Granite 4.2 30b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.1-Codex has 6 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 30b has 11.