Model comparison
GPT-4o vs Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4o scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 47.1 to 9.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 16.6% for GPT-4o and 49.9% for Muse Spark 1.1.
- Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper at $1.25 / $4.25 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for GPT-4o.
- Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| GPT-4o | Muse Spark 1.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 28.6 | 49.9 |
| Released | 2024-05-13 | 2026-04-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $4.25 |
| Results tracked | 72 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads
GPT-4o: 24.8 (#328), Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1297 | 1498 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 31% | — |
| DeepSWE | — | 53.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 21.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 45.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1542 |
| SciCode | — | 58.8% |
| GSO | 0% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 51.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 51.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 61.1% | — |
| CadEval | 26% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 87.2% | — |
| MBPP+ | 72.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Muse Spark 1.1 leads
GPT-4o: 21.0 (#141), Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 31.8% |
| GDPval | 9.9% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 8.6% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 40.5% |
| Cybench | 12.5% | — |
| BALROG | 32.3% | — |
| GBAEval | — | 7.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 15% |
| LMArena Search | 1006 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 40.8% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,520 |
Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads
GPT-4o: 9.4 (#343), Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 15.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1281 | 1486 |
| DTBench | 64.5% | 94.4% |
| LMCA | 16.6% | 49.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 128.97 | 154.21 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| SimpleBench | 17.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 84.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 4.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 13% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 55.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 60.9% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 52.5% |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |
| LiveBench | 55.3% | — |
Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads
GPT-4o: 10.6 (#312), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1285 | 1483 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 0.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 6.4% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 39% |
| Omni-MATH | 29.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 49.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 53.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.3% | — |
Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads
GPT-4o: 28.8 (#242), Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 26% | 57.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1250 | 1478 |
| GPQA Diamond | 49.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 2.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 71.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 15.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.6% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 52% | — |
| MMLU | 88.1% | — |
Multimodal Muse Spark 1.1 leads
GPT-4o: 34.5 (#91), Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1137 | 1293 |
| Video-MME | 71.9% | — |
| GeoBench | 71% | — |
| VPCT | 40% | — |
| LMArena Document | — | 1465 |
| ScienceQA | 88.5% | — |
Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads
GPT-4o: 43.2 (#186), Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | 1472 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1277 | 1518 |
| LMArena French | 1304 | 1494 |
| LMArena German | 1282 | 1466 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1257 | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | 1234 | 1458 |
| LMArena Russian | 1286 | 1483 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1292 | 1464 |
Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads
GPT-4o: 66.6 (#207), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | 1457 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 68.6% | — |
| IFEval | 81.7% | — |
Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads
GPT-4o: 39.4 (#179), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1289 | 1462 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads
GPT-4o: 52.6 (#166), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | 1479 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | 1437 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1302 | 1485 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1927 |
| WildBench | 82.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1260 |
| LiveBench Language | 47.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4o better than Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; GPT-4o lists at $2.50 and $10.
Is GPT-4o or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?
Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 24.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Muse Spark 1.1 does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.1 share?
23 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4o has 72 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 37.