Model comparison

GPT-4o mini vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4o mini OpenAI

25.5

Rank #343 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4o mini scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 17.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 6.9% for GPT-4o mini and 86.7% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for GPT-4o mini.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

GPT-4o mini and Qwen3.7 Flash specifications
GPT-4o miniQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.539.9
Released2024-07-182026-07-15
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K1M
Max output16K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.03
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$0.13
Results tracked607

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 22.0 (#335), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniQwen3.7 Flash
Aider Polyglot3.6%—
WeirdML11.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding43.1%—
LMArena Coding1290—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+72.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 27.5 (#101), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniQwen3.7 Flash
BALROG17.4%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

GPT-4o mini: 8.7 (#347), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniQwen3.7 Flash
Chess Puzzles0%23%
Mystery Game Puzzles12%15%
Epoch Capabilities Index126.56144.64
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench10.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
LiveBench Reasoning32.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1267—
DTBench54.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis50%—
LMCA10.4%—
LiveBench41.3%—
PIQA88.7%—

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

GPT-4o mini: 10.4 (#314), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniQwen3.7 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)0.7%19.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.9%86.7%
Omni-MATH28%—
LiveBench Math36.3%—
LMArena Math1267—
MATH Level 552.6%—
GSM8K91.3%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

GPT-4o mini: 17.7 (#284), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniQwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond37.7%82.3%
SimpleQA Verified8.3%—
MMLU-Pro60.3%—
Confabulations37.2%—
GPQA (HELM)36.8%—
LMArena Expert1235—
BoolQ88.7%—
MMLU81.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 25.9 (#122), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision1066—
Video-MME64.8%—
GeoBench64%—
VPCT34%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 42.0 (#199), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1266—
LMArena Chinese1265—
LMArena French1297—
LMArena German1272—
LMArena Japanese1216—
LMArena Korean1195—
LMArena Russian1275—
LMArena Spanish1276—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 61.9 (#239), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniQwen3.7 Flash
LiveBench Instruction Following56.8%—
IFEval78.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1258—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 39.1 (#186), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1289—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 39.5 (#248), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1286—
LMArena Creative Writing1268—
Short-Story Creative Writing67.2%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing873—
WildBench79.1%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1285—
LiveBench Language28.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4o mini better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o mini or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; GPT-4o mini lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4o mini and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4o mini has 60 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper