Model comparison

GPT-4o mini vs Phi-1.5

GPT-4o mini has enough public results to be ranked (#343); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4o mini OpenAI

25.5

Rank #343 Confirmed

Phi-1.5 Microsoft

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both.
  • Phi-1.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4o mini and Phi-1.5 specifications
GPT-4o miniPhi-1.5
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index25.5—
Released2024-07-182023-09-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window128K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked607

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 22.0 (#335), Phi-1.5: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniPhi-1.5
Aider Polyglot3.6%—
WeirdML11.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding43.1%—
LMArena Coding1290—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+72.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 27.5 (#101), Phi-1.5: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniPhi-1.5
BALROG17.4%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 8.7 (#347), Phi-1.5: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniPhi-1.5
Epoch Capabilities Index126.5691.53
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench10.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning32.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1267—
Mystery Game Puzzles12%—
DTBench54.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis50%—
LMCA10.4%—
HellaSwag—47.6%
LiveBench41.3%—
PIQA88.7%—
WinoGrande—73.4%

Math Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 10.4 (#314), Phi-1.5: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniPhi-1.5
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)0.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.9%—
Omni-MATH28%—
LiveBench Math36.3%—
LMArena Math1267—
MATH Level 552.6%—
GSM8K91.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 17.7 (#284), Phi-1.5: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniPhi-1.5
BoolQ88.7%75.8%
MMLU81.8%37.6%
GPQA Diamond37.7%—
SimpleQA Verified8.3%—
MMLU-Pro60.3%—
Confabulations37.2%—
GPQA (HELM)36.8%—
LMArena Expert1235—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—44.4%
OpenBookQA—37.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 25.9 (#122), Phi-1.5: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniPhi-1.5
LMArena Vision1066—
Video-MME64.8%—
GeoBench64%—
VPCT34%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 42.0 (#199), Phi-1.5: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniPhi-1.5
LMArena Non-English1266—
LMArena Chinese1265—
LMArena French1297—
LMArena German1272—
LMArena Japanese1216—
LMArena Korean1195—
LMArena Russian1275—
LMArena Spanish1276—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 61.9 (#239), Phi-1.5: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniPhi-1.5
LiveBench Instruction Following56.8%—
IFEval78.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1258—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 39.1 (#186), Phi-1.5: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniPhi-1.5
LMArena Longer Query1289—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 39.5 (#248), Phi-1.5: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniPhi-1.5
LMArena Text1286—
LMArena Creative Writing1268—
Short-Story Creative Writing67.2%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing873—
WildBench79.1%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1285—
LiveBench Language28.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4o mini better than Phi-1.5?

GPT-4o mini has enough public results to be ranked (#343); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4o mini and Phi-1.5 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4o mini has 60 scored results on Noometry and Phi-1.5 has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper