Model comparison
GPT-4o mini vs Granite 4.2 8B
Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 25.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4o mini scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.2 8B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 8B leads 37.7 to 17.7.
- Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for GPT-4o mini.
- Granite 4.2 8B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.
- Granite 4.2 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4o mini | Granite 4.2 8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 25.4 | 40.0 |
| Released | 2024-07-18 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 131K |
| Max output | 16K | 118K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $0.06 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 60 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.2 8B leads
GPT-4o mini: 21.6 (#330), Granite 4.2 8B: 39.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1290 | 1379 |
| Aider Polyglot | 3.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 11.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 43.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 83.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 72.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4o mini: 27.2 (#95), Granite 4.2 8B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 17.4% | — |
Reasoning Granite 4.2 8B leads
GPT-4o mini: 8.7 (#343), Granite 4.2 8B: 25.5 (#130)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1267 | 1327 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| SimpleBench | 10.7% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.8% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 12% | — |
| DTBench | 54.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 50% | — |
| LMCA | 10.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.56 | — |
| LiveBench | 41.3% | — |
| PIQA | 88.7% | — |
Math Not comparable
GPT-4o mini: 9.9 (#307), Granite 4.2 8B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 0.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 6.9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 28% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 36.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1267 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 52.6% | — |
| GSM8K | 91.3% | — |
Knowledge Granite 4.2 8B leads
GPT-4o mini: 17.7 (#279), Granite 4.2 8B: 37.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1235 | 1380 |
| GPQA Diamond | 37.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 8.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 60.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 37.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 36.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 88.7% | — |
| MMLU | 81.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4o mini: 25.3 (#117), Granite 4.2 8B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1066 | — |
| Video-MME | 64.8% | — |
| GeoBench | 64% | — |
| VPCT | 34% | — |
Multilingual Granite 4.2 8B leads
GPT-4o mini: 42.2 (#194), Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1266 | 1299 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1264 | 1361 |
| LMArena Russian | 1275 | 1283 |
| LMArena French | 1296 | — |
| LMArena German | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1276 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.2 8B leads
GPT-4o mini: 62.1 (#234), Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#183)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1259 | 1298 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 56.8% | — |
| IFEval | 78.2% | — |
Long Context Granite 4.2 8B leads
GPT-4o mini: 39.1 (#181), Granite 4.2 8B: 40.2 (#154)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1289 | 1323 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 8B leads
GPT-4o mini: 39.7 (#243), Granite 4.2 8B: 49.8 (#183)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o mini | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1286 | 1319 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1268 | 1238 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1285 | 1299 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 67.2% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 873 | — |
| WildBench | 79.1% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 28.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4o mini better than Granite 4.2 8B?
Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 25.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4o mini or Granite 4.2 8B?
Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; GPT-4o mini lists at $0.15 and $0.60.
Is GPT-4o mini or Granite 4.2 8B better for coding?
Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 21.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Granite 4.2 8B does, with 131K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4o mini and Granite 4.2 8B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4o mini has 60 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 8B has 11.