Model comparison

GPT-4 vs Step 3

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 OpenAI

29.1

Rank #316 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

40.5

Rank #149 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 3 leads 37.6 to 10.8.
  • Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4 and Step 3 specifications
GPT-4Step 3
ProviderOpenAIStepFun
Noometry Index29.140.5
Released2023-03-14—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window8K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$30—
Output $ / M tokens$60—
Results tracked3817

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3 leads

GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Step 3
LMArena Coding12541367
WeirdML12.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.2%—
HumanEval+79.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4: —, Step 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Step 3
METR Time Horizons36.1%—

Reasoning Step 3 leads

GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Step 3
LMArena Hard Prompts12411355
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.3%
Chess Puzzles4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles12%—
DTBench62.7%—
LMCA17.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard75.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index125.89—
ForecastBench57.8—
HellaSwag95.3%—
WinoGrande87.5%—

Math Step 3 leads

GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Step 3
LMArena Math12691366
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
MATH Level 523%—
GSM8K92%—

Knowledge Step 3 leads

GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Step 3
LMArena Expert12111333
GPQA Diamond35.7%—
MMLU86.4%—
TriviaQA84.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4: —, Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Step 3
LMArena Vision—1177

Multilingual Step 3 leads

GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Step 3
LMArena Non-English12461327
LMArena Chinese12421397
LMArena German12511371
LMArena Korean11841269
LMArena Russian12511331
LMArena Spanish12611371
LMArena French1283—
LMArena Japanese1209—

Instruction Following Step 3 leads

GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Step 3
LMArena Instruction Following12411332

Long Context Step 3 leads

GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Step 3
LMArena Longer Query12441326

Writing & Preference Step 3 leads

GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Step 3
LMArena Text12631350
LMArena Creative Writing12441321
LMArena Multi-Turn12571341
EQ-Bench Creative Writing752—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4 or Step 3 better for coding?

Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and Step 3 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper