Model comparison

GPT-4 vs Ministral 3B

GPT-4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 375× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 OpenAI

29.1

Rank #316 Confirmed

Ministral 3B Mistral AI

26.2

Rank #338 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 1 category and Ministral 3B in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Ministral 3B leads 26.6 to 10.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 17.1% for GPT-4 and 5.5% for Ministral 3B.
  • Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $60 for GPT-4.
  • Ministral 3B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 8K.
  • Ministral 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4 and Ministral 3B specifications
GPT-4Ministral 3B
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Noometry Index29.126.2
Released2023-03-142024-10-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window8K131K
Max output8K262K
Input $ / M tokens$30$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$60$0.10
Results tracked386

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), Ministral 3B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Ministral 3B
WeirdML12.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46%—
LMArena Coding1254—
BigCodeBench Complete57.2%—
HumanEval+79.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4: —, Ministral 3B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Ministral 3B
METR Time Horizons36.1%—

Reasoning Too close to call

GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Ministral 3B
DTBench62.7%51.7%
LMCA17.1%5.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index125.89118.1
Chess Puzzles4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1241—
Mystery Game Puzzles12%—
BIG-Bench Hard75.1%—
ForecastBench57.8—
HellaSwag95.3%—
WinoGrande87.5%—

Math Ministral 3B leads

GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Ministral 3B
MATH Level 523%14.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
LMArena Math1269—
GSM8K92%—

Knowledge GPT-4 leads

GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Ministral 3B
GPQA Diamond35.7%25.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.3%
LMArena Expert1211—
MMLU86.4%—
TriviaQA84.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), Ministral 3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Ministral 3B
LMArena Non-English1246—
LMArena Chinese1242—
LMArena French1283—
LMArena German1251—
LMArena Japanese1209—
LMArena Korean1184—
LMArena Russian1251—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), Ministral 3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Ministral 3B
LMArena Instruction Following1241—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), Ministral 3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Ministral 3B
LMArena Longer Query1244—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), Ministral 3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Ministral 3B
LMArena Text1263—
LMArena Creative Writing1244—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing752—
LMArena Multi-Turn1257—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 better than Ministral 3B?

GPT-4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 375× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4 or Ministral 3B?

Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; GPT-4 lists at $30 and $60.

Which has the bigger context window?

Ministral 3B does, with 131K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and Ministral 3B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper