Model comparison

GPT-4 vs Granite 4.0 H Small

Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 OpenAI

29.1

Rank #316 Confirmed

Granite 4.0 H Small IBM

36.5

Rank #214 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 2 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 31.4 to 10.8.
  • Granite 4.0 H Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4 and Granite 4.0 H Small specifications
GPT-4Granite 4.0 H Small
ProviderOpenAIIBM
Noometry Index29.136.5
Released2023-03-14—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window8K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$30—
Output $ / M tokens$60—
Results tracked3819

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.0 H Small leads

GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Coding12541249
WeirdML12.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.2%—
HumanEval+79.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4: —, Granite 4.0 H Small: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 4.0 H Small
METR Time Horizons36.1%—

Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads

GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Hard Prompts12411240
Chess Puzzles4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles12%—
DTBench62.7%—
LMCA17.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard75.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index125.89—
ForecastBench57.8—
HellaSwag95.3%—
WinoGrande87.5%—

Math Granite 4.0 H Small leads

GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Math12691247
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
Omni-MATH—29.6%
MATH Level 523%—
GSM8K92%—

Knowledge Granite 4.0 H Small leads

GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Expert12111251
GPQA Diamond35.7%—
MMLU-Pro—56.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.2%
GPQA (HELM)—38.3%
MMLU86.4%—
TriviaQA84.8%—

Multilingual GPT-4 leads

GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Non-English12461216
LMArena Chinese12421249
LMArena Russian12511201
LMArena Spanish12611258
LMArena French1283—
LMArena German1251—
LMArena Japanese1209—
LMArena Korean1184—

Instruction Following Granite 4.0 H Small leads

GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Instruction Following12411222
IFEval—89%

Long Context Too close to call

GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Longer Query12441242

Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 H Small leads

GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Granite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Text12631241
LMArena Creative Writing12441211
LMArena Multi-Turn12571242
EQ-Bench Creative Writing752—
WildBench—73.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 better than Granite 4.0 H Small?

Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4 or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?

Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and Granite 4.0 H Small share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper