Model comparison

GPT-4 vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 OpenAI

29.1

Rank #316 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.6

Rank #163 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 35.6 to 10.8.

Side by side

GPT-4 and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 specifications
GPT-4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index29.139.6
Released2023-03-14—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window8K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$30—
Output $ / M tokens$60—
Results tracked3811

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Coding12541319
WeirdML12.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.2%—
HumanEval+79.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
METR Time Horizons36.1%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Hard Prompts12411308
Chess Puzzles4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles12%—
DTBench62.7%—
LMCA17.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard75.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index125.89—
ForecastBench57.8—
HellaSwag95.3%—
WinoGrande87.5%—

Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Math12691273
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
MATH Level 523%—
GSM8K92%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
GPQA Diamond35.7%—
LMArena Expert1211—
MMLU86.4%—
TriviaQA84.8%—

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Non-English12461285
LMArena Chinese12421358
LMArena Russian12511305
LMArena French1283—
LMArena German1251—
LMArena Japanese1209—
LMArena Korean1184—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Instruction Following12411278

Long Context Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Longer Query12441309

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Text12631311
LMArena Creative Writing12441269
LMArena Multi-Turn12571303
EQ-Bench Creative Writing752—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4 or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper